Request Removal If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the collegeessaywriter. In the case study, the co-CEO John Mackey explained that the purpose of the organization was a heroic one, food inc movie essay. Redesigned the chicken to be bigger, all birds coming off the food inc movie essay have to be about the same size. By clicking "I want to receive an essay" you agree to be contacted via email. Which is shocking to me, upon learning how this happened and the consequences of this happening, needless to say I w as really upset. com, Mar 31, The creators of Food Inc.
Cite this page
As the world continues to evolve through technological innovations, so does the implications brought forth by the increased accessibility to information which is solely meant to enlighten individuals and strengthen their understanding of the specific areas. Of greater concern is how food process is influencing peoples health, as presented in the Food, Inc. Netflix documentary, including the agricultural implications that go past the stomach Kenner, As such, the documentary highlights some of the specific changes that have taken place within the food industry in the past five decades as well as exposing the laws that have kept the overlooked practices as a secret.
The documentary shows that in the current approaches to food production, they are responding to the growth of fast food. Only a handful of multinational corporations have a control over production whose concern is on business and outputs, enormous profits Kenner, The documentary also shows the limited emphasis on health and safety, especially of the food, animals, workers and the implications for customers of which such considerations are overlooked. The government also fails to look into such food production processes, as it supports the production of cheap foods despite the adverse impact on health Food inc movie essay, The documentary focuses on industrial meat, vegetables, and meat production.
In summary, the film concludes that the entire or contemporary food production approaches are inhumane, environmentally and economically unsustainable Kenner, Equally, food inc movie essay, it shows that to a greater extent, the l large food companies have legal and economic powers which are responsible for the governments silence on the issue. In the documentary, different positions are held, food inc movie essay, and as such, brings about the benefits food inc movie essay disadvantages of the implications of agricultural technology. However, some cons are quite stated in the documentary. For one, although agricultural technology has led to mass production of food, there have been profound negative repercussions.
For one, corn is provided as an example, of which the use of maize convertibles for human consumption, feeding animals is leading to adverse effects by overdose people on the nutrient content Kenner, Another con of the mass production of corn is that it brings about serious ethical questions. Besides, with the mass production, comes advertisements that promote fallacies and as such, concealing the vitally harmful information that should be shown to the audience or the populations. Therefore, the documentary outlines that with the changes in the food production industry whereby foods are produced in bulk, the negative implications or ramifications comes about how corn is utilized as convertible corn-syrup is now appearing in almost all food productsthe inhumane animal treatment as well as false advertisements.
The Food Inc. For one, there are the businesses or the multinational food corporations whose aims are on providing products to the market through agricultural technology Au, food inc movie essay, Nonetheless, the government equally has a vested stake as the regulatory framework for setting laws and regulations. The government's silence on the issue has been responsible for the failure to expose the evils done by the larger corporations. There are the economists and environmentalists whose aim or focus is on ensuring that any approaches used in production should be sustainable. The current mass production is not economically and environmentally sustainable thereby very harmful to the health of the populations Au, Also, there are the animal rights groups, and their interest on the ethical question is on the unfair and inhumane treatment of animals.
From the documentary, mass production of food is meant to meet the demands of the populations, food inc movie essay, but the methods of producing meat are inhuman. For example, animals are being forced to eat foods that are not natural, especially steroids, corns and other products that are used for them to grow larger and faster. On the other hand, ethical or harmful effects come about with the genetic modification. Finally, the consumer rights groups equally have a vested stake, in particular on the false advertisement food inc movie essay the mass produced foods due to the agricultural technology whereby harmful elements or aspects of the foods presented in the market are not identified, but instead, the health benefits are excessively mentioned. Food inc movie essay moral views can be used in addressing the ethical issues in the documentary.
In essence, any method of food production should not be harmful to the individual populations while food inc movie essay, animals should not also be harmed or treated inhumanely based on the methods and approaches of production. Accordingly, the utilitarian ethics suggests that the greatest happiness for the masses is a necessity. In the above case, the greatest happiness only goes to the multinational corporations that are reaping profits from the unethical approaches to food production and not considering the implications or ramifications of their methods to the larger populations.
Conversely, the Kantian ethics of duty also finds the issue lacking moral judgment. According to Kantianism, acting ethical is a moral duty, and as such, one should be driven by the necessity and duty of becoming morally upright in his or her action Korsgaard, As such, it is the responsibility of the food corporations to ensure that they are not harming the populations or the consumers. It is also the duty of the government to make sure that any methods and approaches to food production follow the laws that safeguard health and safety of the population. Based on my values, the ethical duty, and moral inclination should lead the multinational corporations and the government to ensure that any approaches to food production are not harmful to the population.
Accordingly, reaping benefits at the expense of the masses is not ethical behavior according to my take, and as such, it should be the duty of everyone to ensure that health and safety become first. Besides, animals too, according to my views have the right to fair treatment. However, those opposing my views would suggest that the world is currently facing a food shortage and mass production by any means should be embraced to provide alternatively better means for feeding the populations. Also, they would argue that ethical concerns of agricultural technology are not evidence-based. Nevertheless, food inc movie essay propositions are food inc movie essay for, to some extent because adverse effects or consequences are based on hard evidence. Also, the world is indeed in a critical situation whereby resources are being depleted with no food for feeding the masses.
To refute such a claim, food inc movie essay, I would suggest that at best, those attacking my position should think of the long-term impacts of the unhealthy methods and processes of food production on people's health and unfair treatment of animals. Agrawal, S. Nanotechnology pros and cons to agriculture: a review. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci, 3 3 Au, R. From genetic engineering to genome engineering: what impact has it made on science and society. Genet, 2, Ives, C. The ethics of offsetting nature. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, food inc movie essay, 13 10 Kenner, R.
The truth about your food with Food, Inc. Korsgaard, C. Kantian ethics, animals, and the law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33 4 If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the collegeessaywriter. net website, please click below to request its removal:. Sorry, but it's not possible to copy the text due to security reasons. Enter your email to get this essay sample. Enter your email and we'll send you a properly formatted printable version of this essay right away. Essay on Food, Inc. Public Health, food inc movie essay. Type of paper:. This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Proponents and food inc movie essay or the pros and cons or who are the players?
Identification of stakeholders and harms and benefits The Food Inc. Discussion of how the various moral philosophies might view the topic Two moral views can be used in addressing the ethical issues in the documentary. Position based on your values Based on my values, the ethical duty, and moral inclination should lead the multinational corporations and the government to ensure that any approaches to food production are not harmful to the population. References Agrawal, S. We can write a custom paper on any topic you need. Order now. Request Removal If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the collegeessaywriter.
net website, please click below to request its removal: Request the removal of this essay. People also read. Submit your request. First Name First name should have at least 6 letters. Last Name Last name should have at least 6 letters. Email Please enter valid email. Phone number Phone number should have at least 10 digits. Comment Please tell us a little more. Would you like to get this essay by email? Your email is invalid! By clicking "I want to receive an essay" you agree to be contacted via email. By clicking "I want to print this essay" you agree to be contacted via email. Thank You!
an essay about health
For one, although agricultural technology has led to mass production of food, there have been profound negative repercussions. For one, corn is provided as an example, of which the use of maize convertibles for human consumption, feeding animals is leading to adverse effects by overdose people on the nutrient content Kenner, Another con of the mass production of corn is that it brings about serious ethical questions. Besides, with the mass production, comes advertisements that promote fallacies and as such, concealing the vitally harmful information that should be shown to the audience or the populations. Therefore, the documentary outlines that with the changes in the food production industry whereby foods are produced in bulk, the negative implications or ramifications comes about how corn is utilized as convertible corn-syrup is now appearing in almost all food products , the inhumane animal treatment as well as false advertisements.
The Food Inc. For one, there are the businesses or the multinational food corporations whose aims are on providing products to the market through agricultural technology Au, Nonetheless, the government equally has a vested stake as the regulatory framework for setting laws and regulations. The government's silence on the issue has been responsible for the failure to expose the evils done by the larger corporations. There are the economists and environmentalists whose aim or focus is on ensuring that any approaches used in production should be sustainable.
The current mass production is not economically and environmentally sustainable thereby very harmful to the health of the populations Au, Also, there are the animal rights groups, and their interest on the ethical question is on the unfair and inhumane treatment of animals. From the documentary, mass production of food is meant to meet the demands of the populations, but the methods of producing meat are inhuman. For example, animals are being forced to eat foods that are not natural, especially steroids, corns and other products that are used for them to grow larger and faster. On the other hand, ethical or harmful effects come about with the genetic modification. Finally, the consumer rights groups equally have a vested stake, in particular on the false advertisement of the mass produced foods due to the agricultural technology whereby harmful elements or aspects of the foods presented in the market are not identified, but instead, the health benefits are excessively mentioned.
Two moral views can be used in addressing the ethical issues in the documentary. In essence, any method of food production should not be harmful to the individual populations while equally, animals should not also be harmed or treated inhumanely based on the methods and approaches of production. Accordingly, the utilitarian ethics suggests that the greatest happiness for the masses is a necessity. In the above case, the greatest happiness only goes to the multinational corporations that are reaping profits from the unethical approaches to food production and not considering the implications or ramifications of their methods to the larger populations. Conversely, the Kantian ethics of duty also finds the issue lacking moral judgment. According to Kantianism, acting ethical is a moral duty, and as such, one should be driven by the necessity and duty of becoming morally upright in his or her action Korsgaard, As such, it is the responsibility of the food corporations to ensure that they are not harming the populations or the consumers.
It is also the duty of the government to make sure that any methods and approaches to food production follow the laws that safeguard health and safety of the population. Based on my values, the ethical duty, and moral inclination should lead the multinational corporations and the government to ensure that any approaches to food production are not harmful to the population. Accordingly, reaping benefits at the expense of the masses is not ethical behavior according to my take, and as such, it should be the duty of everyone to ensure that health and safety become first. Besides, animals too, according to my views have the right to fair treatment. However, those opposing my views would suggest that the world is currently facing a food shortage and mass production by any means should be embraced to provide alternatively better means for feeding the populations.
Also, they would argue that ethical concerns of agricultural technology are not evidence-based. Nevertheless, such propositions are called for, to some extent because adverse effects or consequences are based on hard evidence. Kraft Foods Group, Inc. is a compilation of C. Post, Oscar Meyer and James Lewis Kraft. Each of. Rhetorical Analysis: Food Inc. Our daily consumption of food is. Abstract Sunshine Food Inc. is one of the leading food processing companies in the U. Since inception years ago, Sunshine Food, Inc. When walking down the meat isle in the grocery store, do people stop to think where the meat came from? A lot of the labels on food will say that. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. PhD Essay Countries City Village Farm Food inc Argumentative Essay.
Order original essay sample specially for your assignment needs. get custom essay. Corporate Culture Of Gap Inc And Pacsun Inc. Essay type Research. Pompano Helicopters Inc. versus Westwood One, Inc. Food inc review. Marketing Kraft Food Group, Inc. Food Inc Evaluation Paper. Case Study - Sunshine Food Inc. Food Inc Analysis. While feeding cattle corn is a great way to make them larger quicker, it still is not the right way to feed cattle because feeding them too much corn can cause them to die because of a disease called e-coli. When cattle get this disease it sometimes is not caught and the cow gets slaughtered and ends up on our dinner plate and then we receive the disease by eating the meat. This needs to change cows need to be fed grass and hay, and should not be on a corn only diet.
This film also covered the poultry industry and how poultry is being grown at a very fast rate and how the chicken houses are not safe or very sanitary. The poultry houses are sealed with no Kali Smith Feb. The documentary Food Inc. has raised a lot of issues that face how our agriculture system is runs. Its purpose was to give people an insight to what is actually going on in the food industry and to show us what we are actually eating and how it is processed. The creators of Food Inc. uncovered some very disturbing information.
From the documentary, I came up with many different issues that the food system has. These issues included: a few huge corporations controlling almost all of the food industry, poor treatment of the farmers, workers and animals, diseases being created from the process, the protections that these huge corporations have a the blindness that consumers face. They include: Monsanto Company, Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods, and Perdue Farms. It all started with the fast food industry coming alive. Fast food needs the food to be prepared in massive quantities and a cheaply and quickly as possible. These companies found a way to do just that and took the industry by storm. They turned the kitchen into a factory assembly line and the workers into expendable assets.
Food started to be processed differently and animals started to be seen only as their end product. They have gotten so big that it has created a monopoly around the food industry and no one seems to know how to get a leg up on them Notting Foods Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The company produces a wide variety of branded, processed food products and is the recognised leader in almost every retail and food service market it serves. The company anticipated consumer demand, segmented a market, concentrated on production and marketing so that it subsequently dominated the segment. In , WEALTH magazine ranked Notting Foods Inc. The survey ranked the 10 largest companies by revenues in 66 industries, including large subsidiaries of foreign firms. According to WEALTH, the survey results reflected the opinions of 10 executives, directors and securities analysts who rated the companies in their own industries using eight criteria, including innovation, employee talent, use of corporate assets, social is a very eye opening documentary to the American way of eating and even the American way of life.
The investigative journalist Robert Kenner really digs deep behind the reasons why Americans have become so distanced from the source of their food. It is interesting to see to what extent large corporations control the American economy to the point of deciding what lands on the dinner plate of the lower class families. The interests of the people have become the veil of the interest of the large food pharmaceutical and oil corporations. Whole Foods is a large international organization with thousands of employees. In the case study, the co-CEO John Mackey explained that the purpose of the organization was a heroic one.
So McGregor's Theory Y in Organizational Behavior is prevalent in the way they do business. Management at whole foods is really just the mechanism to help find and bring people into the organization that assist the organization in achieving this goal. He recognizes that employees that are engaged, have the ability to make decisions and are able to do so effectively, and ultimately translates into conscientious customer service are ultimately more happy. When the staff is happy, their level of service is better, and then customers are happy, which equates to more revenue, and more profits presumably and in turn results in happy shareholders.
It is a perpetuating evolution in business. True efficacy of this theory would dictate that the management team has the versatility to hire in the way they want, and to leverage resources that give them the greatest opportunity to achieve the goal of finding the right people but that subject was not broached in the case study. Whole Foods recognizes that the success of their organization and its ability to achieve profitability and shareholder value Semester Paper: Food, Inc. This single statement paints a vivid picture in ones mind. Not only is the way we grow our food changing, but we are also changing our bodies. It takes about 47 days to fully grow a chicken, and it is twice as big due to the fact that these chickens are injected with hormones. While this literally brings more food to the table, it might not be worth it in the long run.
There are many advantages as well as disadvantages that come with the industrialization of food. Using the chicken as an example. In the documentary, they explained that everyone loves white meat, therefor they make the chicken breast incredibly large to produce more meat from one animal. This is good in a sense that more food is being produced, but the truth is, it is changing, physiologically. According to an article written on mericola. com, girls as early of the age of seven are beginning go through puberty changes, something that was not happening until the ages of Another disadvantage about the industrialization of food is the stuff we use to grow our food. Most of our fruits and vegetables are grown using pesticides, which are to keep insects off of them.
After watching Food Inc. It was sick, very disturbing and disappointing to see the corruption of big corporations. It is truly frightening to know that our food system has not only gotten to such an extreme point, but that we did it. We as consumers allowed this to happen; we endorsed these multinational companies by purchasing their products. Last semester Prof. Greene had us watch this movie to show how some systems work and he made a proposition that would actually solve the obesity problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment